Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

You have once again entered the world of survival horror: A REplay of the Resident Evil series

Recommended Posts

Now that I've completed the 12 Resident Evil Games games I wanted to play, I thought it would be nice to take a moment before the the release of the Resident Evil 2 remake and reflect on the series as a whole. Here are some observations and thoughts that have popped into my head over the past six months as I played through this long and storied franchise.



The Resident Evil franchise is wildly inconsistent quality-wise.


With this many entries, any franchise is bound to have highs and lows in terms of quality. Resident Evil is no different. What surprised me, though, is how large the delta was between the truly great and the truly bad. The best of them are among the greatest games ever made, in my opinion. The worst are spectacular misfires that did so much damage to the franchise's reputation that it’s a wonder the series didn’t get discontinued at certain points.


I would expect more consistency from one of the biggest franchises in gaming, but that's not what we can get. It's a bit of a crapshoot as to whether a particular isntallment is any good or not. I think this is partly why my interest in the series has ebbed and flowed over the years. Prior to and after the release of Resident Evil 4, I was totally on board for each new game. I bought Resident Evil 5 on Xbox 360 as soon as it was released in early 2009. It was good, but a bit of a disappointment. Resident Evil 6 came just three years later, and I skipped it completely at the time because everyone hated it so much. It was so bad, that I didn’t even play the excellent Resident Evil 7 until a couple months ago for this journey through the entire series, all because the quality appeared to be declining with each successive release after RE4.


I hope that Capcom has learned from these missteps so that they will be less likely to make them again in the future. Between both Resident Evil 7 and the Resident Evil 2 remake, we're experiencing one of the better periods for the franchise now. I'm on board for whatever Capcom does next, but I will still be watching for any signs that the series is slipping again on the quality front.



Every game does something new and different.


Resident Evil 4 and Resident Evil 7 get the most credit for taking the series in bold new directions—and rightfully so. That said, when playing through all of these games, I was surprised to see how each one tried to put its own unique spin on survival horror. Whether it’s the zapping system in RE2, the use of Nemesis in RE3, the introduction of online co-op play in RE5, or the general shitty-ness RE6, each entry tries to do something new and unique. Some of these ideas work better than others, but you can't say that each game is simply a carbon copy of the previous ones. Yes, many of them share similarities—they are all part of the same series after all—but Capcom at least seems willing to try new ideas to keep the basic formula fresh for returning players.


That said, RE4 and RE7 deserve special recognition for reinventing the franchise. In both cases, the games that preceded them (Resident Evil 0 and Resident Evil 6, respectively) were not well received. RE4 and RE7 brought the series back to relevance by throwing out what wasn't working and doubling down its best qualities. Doing this once was an incredible achievement. The fact that Capcom has done it twice now is miraculous.



I miss the old fixed-camera angle games.


When going back and replaying the pre-RE4 games, I was struck by how much I enjoyed them. I wish that Capcom—or anyone else for that matter—would make another game like them again. They were great in their own way and allowed for a type of gameplay that you don't get with either an over-the-shoulder view or in first-person. They emphasized exploring and puzzle-solving. Combat was more about deciding to use precious resources rather than the player's ability to pull off a successful headshot. They were more thoughtful and deliberate, and the slower pace made them more unsettling.



Abandoning the fixed-camera angles in RE4 and beyond was the right move.


I can’t fault Capcom for switching to the over-the-shoulder perspective though. Overall, it’s a superior design that allows for better controls, making these games easier to play for more people. Tank controls, while necessary in a game where the camera perspective shifts wildly from scene to scene, are unintuitive. I think players were more willing to accept them in the late ‘90s because 3D games were still so new and very few developers had cracked how to do controls in 3D spaces very well. Nowadays, this is a solved problem, and games have improved tremendously in this regard.


If Resident Evil had stuck with both the fixed-camera angles and tank controls (RE4 technically had tank controls, after all), the series would not be around anymore.  Fortunately, Capcom did make that change, and we’re still playing new entries in the series to this very day.



"What the fuck is she wearing?"


This was my wife's reaction upon seeing any of the alternative costumes for the women in these games.



Ranking Resident Evil.


In Mark's thread revisiting The Legned of Zelda series, he has been ranking each game as he completes it. I didn't think to do that at the start of this project, so I'm going to attempt to do it now.


However, rather than ranking the games numerically from 1 to 12, I'm going to do something a little different. I'm going to group them into four tiers of quality, ranging from bad to best. Since there are twelve games total, I decided that each tier needs to have three games. That way I have to really consider which games are best and make some tough decisions about where to place them. Each game is listed chronologically according to its original release date.


Zombie Tier

Poorly designed and poorly executed, these games can be skipped by anyone other than the most enthusiastic fans. Otherwise, shoot 'em in the head. Multiple times.




Resident Evil: Director’s Cut

Blasphemy? Perhaps. I know this is widely considered a classic, and that it popularized the survival horror genre in the late-'90s, but it does not hold up well when compared to the other games. Low-polygon characters with simple backgrounds, abysmal voice acting, and cheesy full-motion video cut scenes using real actors make this one feel the more dated than any other game in the entire franchise.





Resident Evil 0

Slow, cumbersome inventory management makes this game a slog from beginning to end. It's a shame because the visuals are some of the most impressive of the entire franchise. There was so much potential here, and it just feels wasted on bad execution.





Resident Evil 6

Big, loud, and dumb. Even as an all-out action game, it doesn’t fare well. It has no sense of pacing, and enemy encounters are bland and unimpressive. It’s also the longest game of the franchise with four entire campaigns to complete, which doesn’t do it any favors.



Nemesis Tier

Decent games that don’t quite live up to their potential. A bit more polish, and they could have been truly great.




Resident Evil 3: Nemesis

Capcom tried to shake the established formula up with mixed results. The dodge mechanic makes combat frustrating and is unreliable in execution. Overall, this is one of the hardest, most frustrating to complete in the series.





Resident Evil 5

This game could have been so much better if it didn't try so hard to copy Resident Evil 4. It hits a lot of the same beats, but in the same way that a joke told a second time is less funny, RE5 isn't as impactful as the game that preceded it.





Resident Evil Revelations

This game's biggest sin is that it's just so bland and forgettable. It won't frustrate you the way the games in the Zombie Tier do, but it doesn't do anything to truly stand out either. Acceptable but not essential.



Wesker Tier

Excellent games that stand as solid entries in the RE franchise, with only minor flaws holding them back from true greatness.




Resident Evil 2 (1998)

An amazing follow up to the original PS1 game. It does everything the first did, only better. Better graphics, better story, and it gave you a very good reason to play both campaigns back-to-back. I only wish that the B scenario didn’t feel so repetitive.





Resident Evil CODE: Veronica X

Previously, this was my second-favorite of the fixed-camera games, but upon playing it again, I think it doesn't hold up as well as RE2. The supporting characters are overly silly and Wesker’s presence feels like a wasted opportunity. I still greatly enjoy it on this playthough though.





Resident Evil Revelations 2

Forget the fact that this is a lower-budget title in a side series that runs alongside the proper numbered entries. This is a solid game in every regard and does so much right. It feels great to play, and improves upon ideas that weren't executed well in other titles.



Baker Tier

These games are not only the best in the series but are some of the greatest games ever made, period. I love them, and would happily replay them any time, preferably on a dark and stormy night.




Resident Evil (2002)

The pinnacle of the fixed-camera angle games. It has all the atmosphere, puzzles, and pacing that made survival horror a truly great video game genre.





Resident Evil 4

A successful reinvention of the series that placed a heavier emphasis on action, but still managed to feel like Resident Evil. Its two sequels tried so hard to outdo it, but never managed to reach the same heights as this modern classic.





Resident Evil 7: Biohazard

By far, the scariest game in the series, and a second successful reinvention of it. It took Resident Evil in a bold new direction while also bringing it back to its roots as a survival horror game. Coupled with some of the best DLC, this is one of the greatest games of this console generation.




"This is my, last escape..."


So, what’s next? Where does the series go from here?


Well, obviously, the remake of Resident Evil 2 is almost here. Reviews suggest that it’s a stellar reimagining of the classic PlayStation game. I’m excited as hell to finally playing it on Friday. I have high hopes, and I suspect I'm going to like it. The only question is, which of those tiers will I put it in when I complete it? My hope is that, at the very least, it goes into the Wesker Tier. I would love for it to be good enough to put in the Baker Tier, but it's got to do some amazing things for it to stand next to those three games.


  • Like 4

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Last night, I completed my first official playthrough of Resident Evil 2 remake. I did the Claire campaign with Leon 2nd run on Standard difficulty. Today, I started a Leon run and got through most of RPD. I’m debating whether or not I want to do another full run through the game including a Claire 2nd run. I’m having fun with it, but worry I might burn out if I play it too much in such a short period of time. 


As for my official write-up on the game, I’m thinking I might wait until after I have a chance to play “The Ghost Survivors” DLC, which is due next week. I’d like to see what it is like so I can include my thoughts on it as well. I may also dip my toes into “The 4th Survivor”, which is something I never played on the original version.


Overall, I’m not in a big rush to finish this game up. I want to savor this game as much as possible given that I’ve been waiting for it for so long.


That’s all for now. More updates soon!

  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this