GreenMonkey Posted September 27, 2006 Report Share Posted September 27, 2006 http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-6119949.html?part=rss&tag=feed&subj=zdnn The "Sony Reader Portable Reader" system will sell for about $350. For a limited period, new Connect customers will receive a $50 credit to buy books from the service. Electronic books cost on average about 25 percent less than the cover price of physical books, a spokesman said. Sony's latest generation reader, announced in North America at the Consumer Electronics Show in January, garnered attention for the electronic ink technology it employs made by E Ink of Cambridge, Mass. It uses new technology that allows digital text and graphics to be displayed without power-hungry back-lit screens. Much like regular paper, the Sony Reader screen is not back-lit and requires a light source in the room to view the page. You'll have to do better than that to make me give up my behemoth hardcover tomes! :rock Tell me again how this is better than a few paperbacks? I read pretty fast and even I can't see the gain in this - unless you really want to haul around 30 bazillion books just like people haul around 30 bazillion mp3s. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Camp Posted September 27, 2006 Report Share Posted September 27, 2006 Have you seen one of these in action? They aren't perfect yet but the text is so crisp that it startles you at first. It does not look like an LCD. It also doesn't look printed either...it's unique but very, very readable. Once they get them to do color and sell for $50 the tide will turn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan FB Posted September 27, 2006 Report Share Posted September 27, 2006 I think it's pretty cool. Due to the way E-ink works, battery life is based on page turns (7500) instead of how long the device is turned on, which is great for reading. Also it doesn't just read their DRM'd e-books, it can also read/play: 1. TXT2. RTF 3. PDF (Unencrypted) 4. BBeB (Encrypted and Unencrypted) 5. JPEG 6. GIF 7. BMP 8. PNG 9. MP3 (Unencrypted) 10. AAC (Unencrypted) . Add a touchscreen, color, and a little less cost and I'd definitely be looking at one seriously. Having all my technical references in one small, lightweight device is much more appealing to me than adding yet another tome of dead tree to my already packed bookshelves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foogledricks Posted September 27, 2006 Report Share Posted September 27, 2006 I actually can't wait for a time where magazines and newspapers can be read electronically on the go without sacrificing the important parts of the experience. This is good news that the technology is making progress. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rustyjaw Posted September 27, 2006 Report Share Posted September 27, 2006 I am all over e-books when the price and selection is right. I haven't seen one of these in person yet, but I've read about the technology and I can't wait. Tell me again how this is better than a few paperbacks? Well, for me as a reader mainly of non-fiction, being able to search a book would be great. Being able to carry some reference books around (not just dictionaries, but any book that I feel like using as a reference) would also be really nice. Many times while I'm reading something, it will remind me of a point made in another book...if I'm at home, I will sometimes look through other books to see if I can find it...which can be difficult. In the future, I can imagine looking through a bibliography, or 'suggested reading' section, and being able to instantly look at the content of the books listed, and having the option to buy one or more on the spot. Then there is the environmental aspect. Presumably, one could buy a single reader and use it for years, sparing countless trees. Of course the reader itself, being an electronic device, will have an environmental impact of it's own...but this should be offset by the waste that paper represents (remember, recycling itself takes energy), especially if you can download newspapers and other media directly to it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenMonkey Posted September 28, 2006 Author Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 Hmm, good points. I can see the use for stuff like magazines and newspapers, certainly - which pretty much get chucked on a constant basis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisBardon Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 I can see the use for stuff like magazines and newspapers, certainly - which pretty much get chucked on a constant basis. True, something like this, done right, could see a resurgence in things like 'zine publication (kind of a text version of the almost-ubiquitous podcast). Certainly a great idea for reference materials though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robot Monkey Posted September 28, 2006 Report Share Posted September 28, 2006 With a good price, I'd love something like this for periodicals, but that's pretty much it. I personally don't have faith Sony's approach to DRM, interface design and weird proprietary issues, so no actual books for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.